I'm curious how you'd define "grassroots"

Posted by Ryan Jerz 03/27/2009. Permalink | Shortlink | Tweet it!

On my drive home this evening, I was listening to the Cory Farley Show (not responsible for bad websites) on the radio. His guest today was Dave Aiazzi, Reno City Councilman and friend to mrjerz.org. I say that because I like Dave Aiazzi, and you’ll see what I mean in a minute.

One of the cooler things about Farley’s show, which I just began listening to this week as it moved tot he afternoon drive spot, is that there are a ton of regulars who call and he seems to know because of that. They go by their first names, and he recognizes them on hold. Then there was the guy who called today and used his first and last name. He wanted to get at Dave, it seemed. It was Bob Fulkerson (again with the bad site).

If you don’t know, Fulkerson is one of those dudes whose organization tends to oppose just about anything that might make something grow. I’ve always loved that irony about the political term “progressive.” In actuality, I have some respect for Bob Fulkerson. I’ve spoken to him and he was gracious enough to send me some documents for use on Reno Baby! I also agree with him (sort of) on why he called the show today. He called in support of a bill before the legislature that would change the way city councils are elected. Currently, only the primaries are confined to the actual area the councilperson will represent. The general election takes the race citywide. This law would confine the general election to the ward as well.

I’ve long thought the way our councilpeople were elected was a terrible way to do it, and feel like only my ward should be electing our representative. We have an at-large councilperson (and a mayor) to theoretically represent the interests of the entire city. There’s no reason why someone across town should have a say over what my councilperson does. This was Fulkerson’s point. Aiazzi countered with his own point—that it should be up to the voters to decide. He said he doesn’t think the legislature should make the rule for Reno. I agree there.

Then Fulkerson left the rails. He used, as an example, Aiazzi’s 2004 run against Patty Melton (and presumably her husband in 2008).

His example was this: in 2004, Melton and Aiazzi both received 42% of the vote in the primary (confined to the particular ward). The remaining 16% was divided among some other candidates. This meant that Aiazzi and Melton would square off against only one another in the general election (citywide). In that race, Aiazzi raised $140,000 and Melton raised $40,000. At that point, he described Melton as the “grassroots” candidate. If Cory Farley had mentioned the show’s phone number at any point in the next fifteen minutes, I would have called in. I was livid.

Here’s the thing. In all the time I worked for the one local television station that put candidates on the air to discuss issues, and all the time I’ve been a part of the local online community, I’ve never even seen Patty Melton in person, and I’ve never come across her online until searching for her site tonight. Dave Aiazzi, on the other hand, is everywhere. I see him walking around local events, like the outdoor West Street Market and the River Festival. I see him hanging around at local spots downtown, like Imperial (he stopped by and said hello to all of us at the blogger dinner Wednesday night). He helps out with the Reno Bike Project. And I see him leaving comments on this site and many others. Oh yeah, Artown, anyone? He’s also a member of Reno Baby! and he’s not afraid to jump in there and mix it up. That’s about as “grassroots” as it gets. The fact that he raised more money is likely due in part to that, and in part to the fact that he’s a trusted, thoughtful decision maker.

On the other hand, I was especially disappointed to hear him dismissed like that by a guy who, when I spoke to him on the phone, I personally invited to become a member of Reno Baby! (he’s still not), but I do see him hobnobbing with a particular assemblywoman who also has snubbed similar invitations to stoop down to the level of regular people. As far as I’m concerned, Dave Aiazzi could teach Bob Fulkerson a thing or two about “grassroots.” But the bigger question is this: does P.L.A.N. really view someone as publicly visible as Dave Aiazzi as non-grassroots? Aren’t they the one group who’s supposed to be in touch with what the real people of the community want?

Ryan JerzRyan Jerz is an all-around good guy who shoots photos and video, builds websites, and works in athletics at the University of Nevada, Reno. He received a Masters Degree in 2007 from the University of Nevada, Reno's Reynolds School of Journalism.

Comments

bluelyon wrote:

They think they own the word “grassroots.” Many on the left think that anything THEY do is “grassroots,” while anything the other side does is controlled by some puppet master. It’s another lie they tell themselves.

Agree with you that wards should elect their own rep. We have the same issue when it comes to electing county commissioners. In Lyon County it has meant that the old guard, with its roots in the south of the county, has a stranglehold on the commission.

Mar 28, 07:44 AM


no wrote:

Great post Ryan. People like Fulkerson and Sheila Leslie have a history of acting as if because what they do is cloaked under the veil of being “progressive,” that they can therefore do no wrong. Anyone who can objectively watch either of these two in action should be astounded by their arrogance in how they claim to know what’s best for others.

Because they get so much non-critical airtime from their friends in the news media (Reno New & Review), and an occasional clueless blogger, it’s rare for someone to take them to task publicly. So thank you.

It’s ironic that Fulkerson used Aiazzi’s run against Melton as an example since Melton says Aiazzi’s won because he was bought by special interests. Anyone know where P.L.A.N gets its money? Isn’t P.L.A.N. a special interest group?

Mar 28, 08:48 AM


The Anon Guy wrote:

I think using “grassroots” to describe a candidate has become almost a generic word for either an underdog, challenger, the guy with the least amount of cash or any combination of these.

Mar 28, 06:07 PM


Ryan Jerz wrote:

Anon,

How about a better word – loser.

I’m not necessarily trying to call out P.L.A.N. on this. I did really want to demonstrate that Fulkerson implying that Dave Aiazzi is not grassroots is ludicrous. Aiazzi epitomizes the term. However, it occurred to me as I read these comments that I missed a critical point—that P.L.A.N. is elitist. They are maddeningly so.

Mar 28, 08:21 PM


LB wrote:

Without looking it up, I’d define grassroots as arising from the community rather than professional politics. So to me a grassroots candidate would be someone who’s never been in politics before and supported by average people rather than political parties or big contributors.

Using this definition, I’d want to know more about the sources of Aiazzi’s and Melton’s money before I applied the “grassroots” label to either one. However, it’s hard for me to see someone that few have ever met or seen as a grassroots candidate. I mean, isn’t having support from a LOT of regular people early in a campaign the only way a grassroots candidate can hope to defeat a traditional politician?

I do have a lot of respect for Aiazzi after seeing his thoughtful comments on my blog and hearing him call in to talk shows to explain things that people seem to be misunderstanding.

Dave, if you’re reading this, you didn’t make it down to my end of the bloggers table the other night!

Mar 28, 10:41 PM


The Anon Guy wrote:

They’re probably interchangeable. But, hey, it sounds a lot cooler to say the “grassroots underdog couldn’t match the big corporate interests” than “Hell, the poor sap never had a chance.”

Mar 28, 11:52 PM


bluelyon wrote:

LB – any grassroots candidate who has substantial community support but has “never been in politics” before most likely has at least been very active in the community in order to garner a level of support that will make them a viable candidate. Further, this person may not be a professional politician, but I can almost guarantee that they’ve had to deal with a lot of “politics” in all the organizations they’ve been involved in. So, while that person may never have held elected office, dollars to donuts they know how to play the game.

Mar 29, 01:49 PM


LB wrote:

Blue Lyon—I totally agree with your view of grassroots candidates, at least the ones with a shot at succeeding. I don’t think that description fits Patty Melton.

Mar 29, 08:46 PM


Mike McDowell wrote:

Good article, Jerz. Grassroots really just refers to approaching something from the ground (or lowest level) up – hence “roots.” Typically, this is the approach of the candidate who doesn’t have the campaign dollars to use mass media to market their platform to the people. But, I agree with “The Anon Guy” in that we too often assign the “grassroots” title to whomever the less-funded or even underdog candidate is – and that’s really the wrong thing to do. Dave is definitely comfortable with approaching politics at the grass roots – regardless of the amount of funding he is able to raise.

Mar 31, 11:04 PM


Commenting is closed for this article.